Website ale eza lay letgegnew techilalke mulun.

This book is better for explaining the mindset of various kinds of Muslims than portraying the Christian faith as true, more peaceful, and better than Islam. The ironic thing is that even though the author's faith in Islam was shaken because of contradictions in the Quran and inhumane treatment of people ( e.g. men allowed to rape women captured in war, beheading men and children), he could of used his same grievances against Islam for the Bible, especially in the Old Testament. The author conveniently spent most of his time in the New Testament, seemingly missing the point that the God in the Old Testament (who had men, women, and children of entire civilizations killed without mercy) is the same God in the New Testament. Not to mention that the New Testament predicts that God will kill everyone in hellfire who doesn't believe in Him ("the wicked"), women and children included. When the author, referring to how the the Quran mercilessly destroyed families by killing the men and boys while selling the women into slavery, said, "What if that happened to me and my family?", I thought that he could of used the exact same reasoning in the Old Testament where similar things happened repeatedly when the nation of Israel, under the command of God and Moses, mercilessly destroyed entire civilizations and even "took women for themselves" who were captured. Of course it is easier to make the Bible seem slightly more peaceful than the Quran when you ignore the Old Testament of the Bible and the ultimate fiery doom of the world that the New Testament predicts. Furthermore, there are numerous contradictions in the entire Bible too. The author seems to be oblivious to all of this and doesn't answer a single one of the alleged contradictions. And then there was a weird part of the book where the author has a conversation with one of his best Christian friends, David, and receives an eyebrow-raising statement. Starting on page 130: "Alright, David, I've been looking into textual criticism some more, and I've found problems." "What do you have?" "Looks like I was right about whole sections of the Bible being interpolations. Bible scholars are saying that the end of Mark is not original, and neither the story in John about the woman caught in adultery. You know, the story where Jesus says, 'Let he who is without sin cast the first stone?" "Yeah, I know the story. YOU'RE RIGHT, THEY'RE NOT ORIGINAL TO THE TEXT. WHAT'S YOUR POINT? [capitalization added for emphasis]" Later on, David makes an even weirder statement about parts of the New Testament Bible. Starting on page 132: "And I told you, VIRTUALLY NO SCHOLAR CONSIDERS THOSE SEGMENTS AS PARTS OF THE BIBLE ANYMORE [capitalization added for emphasis]. You need to show me a major change in something we actually consider a part of the Bible." David made these weird statements about the end of Mark, an entire story in John, and the part of first John that talks about the Trinity (Father, Word, and Spirit are one). Who would believe any part of the Bible to be true if it has made-up stories in it? This is when I began to realize that David was not the normal Christian who took the entire Bible to be "the Word of God". In fact, no where does David or any other Christian in this book attest to the Bible being the "Word of God". They make the Bible to just be a collection of manuscripts compiled by men over time that may have interpolations (additions) added to them. Hence the reason David believes entire parts of the Bible are basically fabricated. The author had every reason to be shocked as much as I was shocked at this attitude David and seemingly other learned Christians had towards the Bible. Next, when it came down to answering the author's questions about Christianity at these religious panels someone had at their house where learned Christians would gather with people from other religions, the Christians would say something like, "Most scholars agree that Jesus rose again. It's a universal fact". What am I supposed to do with that? If I don't want to seem stupid I must agree

Eniem feligallehu gin ye muslim nw ye lela

Lolz u better start researching instead of one mans testimony

Look it up on youtube on Christian audio book channel or just simply search for it

The fuck does that mean