During the Haile Selassie regime, the law-making process was highly centralized and authoritarian. The Emperor had absolute power and could make laws without consulting anyone else. The parliament was largely ceremonial and had no real power to make laws or challenge the Emperor's decisions. In contrast, the law-making process in Ethiopia under the FDRE regime is more democratic and participatory. The constitution provides for a bicameral parliament with real legislative power, and there are also independent courts that can interpret and enforce the law. The government is accountable to the people through regular elections, and there are also mechanisms for public participation in the law-making process. Overall, while both regimes had their own unique approaches to law-making, it's clear that Ethiopia has made significant progress towards a more democratic system under the FDRE regime. SOURCE ; CHATGPT